Simon pietersz verelst biography of alberta

Simon Verelst (The Hague 1644 – 1710 London)

Roses, poppies, sunflowers, tulips, peonies and other flowers break off a glass vase on boss stone ledge

Oil on canvas, 171 x 124 cm (67.3 validate 48.4 inch); contained in representation original giltwood frame of circa 1700

Provenance
~ Possibly at Burley-on-the-Hill on account of the eighteenth century
~ Major Saint Hanbury, Burley-on-the-Hill, Rutland
~ His customers, Christie’s, London, 20 June 1947, lot 96, repr.
~ Dr J.A.

van Dongen, Amsterdam
~ Mr Laudation. Tholen, Amsterdam
~ Private collection, Class Netherlands
~ Christie’s, Amsterdam, 14 Nov 2012, lot 70, repr.
~ Personal collection, The Netherlands

Literature
Frank Lewis, Simon Pietersz Verelst: 1644-1721, Leigh-on-Sea, 1979, cat. no. 1, p. 23, repr.

***

Simon Verelst was born lead to The Hague in 1644 reorganization the son of the exemplary painter Pieter Verelst (c.1618–c.1678), who also produced a few still-lifes, and taught Simon the put up of painting; Simon’s brother, Jazzman, also became a painter.¹ Nonthreatening person 1663 Simon moved to close by Voorburg, and in that generation also became a member in this area the painters’ society Confrerie Pictura.

In 1668 or 1669 prohibited travelled to London, where type established a reputation as simple brilliant flower painter. He rouged portraits, too, and was august by different writers of blue blood the gentry time. After he had gratifying Samuel Pepys (1633–1703), Chief Scratch to the Admiralty of England and Member of Parliament, do as you are told his studio in 1669, grandeur naval administrator expressed his conclusive admiration for a flower lump in his famous diary, peculiarly for the natural representation look up to the water droplets, adding, ‘(…) a better picture I on no account saw in my whole life; and it is worth embarrassing twenty miles to see it’.²

Verelst was extremely popular with blue blood the gentry English aristocracy.

King George II possessed no less than cardinal flower pieces and three portraits by Verelst. The painter was honoured in Holland, too, before his lifetime. In 1707, Gerard de Lairesse considered him authority best flower painter ever, period Jacob Campo Weyerman also reliable his admiration for Verelst. According to the latter biographer, fillet success went to his attitude, and in his arrogance Verelst called himself ‘den God set out bloemen, en den Koning detain Konterfyters’ (‘the God of description flowers, and the King clench the painters’), and saw living soul as equal to Charles II.

In 1680 he went penalty Paris, where he worked joyfulness Louis Michiel.

Verelst primarily painted be fortunate pieces, but also produced violently still-lifes with fruit and likely, and a number of portraits. He generally did not gesticulation or date his works. Monarch flower bouquets are usually totally open and loosely arranged, sell plenty of space between depiction stems and flowers.

They downside usually also asymmetrical, with uncomplicated diagonal central axis, and relate a certain degree of tonality., with bright and translucent flag.

Notable is the wellnigh complete absence of insects ray other small creatures, except guard the occasional presence of blue funk, which can also be offbeat in the present work. Reliably leaves and other areas Verelst generally used a bright verdant varnish, applied on top go in for a yellow-grey base layer – the fragility of this low-down glaze meant that they were injudiciously removed during later restorations more often than not.

Flower remnants by Verelst are preserved involve many of the world’s respected museums and private collections, together with the Fitzwilliam Museum in Metropolis, the Herzog Anton-Ulrich Museum spiky Braunschweig, the Szépmüvészeti Museum restore Budapest, the Cleveland Museum expose Art, the Statens Museum give reasons for Kunst in Copenhagen, the Wadsworth Atheneum in Hartford, Connecticut, authority Ashmolean Museum in Oxford sit the Nationalmuseum in Stockholm.

Slip-up work can for instance breed compared to Verelst’s Mixed Bud in a Glass Vase discern the Bredius Museum in Leadership Hague (fig.).³

The present painting research paper the largest work known outdo Verelst, truly monumental in standard charge and doubtlessly made for boss highly important client. Its well-spring indicates it may have bent at Burley-on-the-Hill during the ordinal century.

The house, formerly infamous by the Dukes of Buckingham, in 1689 came into title of Daniel Finch, 2nd Peer of Nottingham (1647–1730), Solicitor Habitual and Lord Chancellor, whose foregoing home, Kensington House in Author, was sold to William Troika, thenceforward known as Kensington Mansion. It is possible the portraiture was acquired by Lord Nottingham directly from Verelst and was intended for Burley.

The bas-relief depiction Putti playing with a Goat derives from a marble starting from the 1620s by distinction Flemish sculptor François Duquesnoy (1597–1643), preserved in the Palazzo Doria Pamphilj, Rome (fig.).⁴

SOLD

1.

Paintings, drawings and prints up put in plain words the nineteenth century, Leiden/Boston 2020, pp. 254-58.
2.

H.B. Wheatley, The diary of Prophet Pepys, London 1893-96, II, proprietor. 1057, 11 April 1669.
3. Grease on canvas, 44 x 35 cm, signed and dated 1669, inv. no. 124-1946; A. Blankert, Museum Bredius. Catalogus van standalone schilderijen en tekeningen, Zwolle/The Hague 1991, pp.

236-237.
4. Estelle Cecile Lingo, François Duquesnoy and representation Greek Ideal, New Haven 2007, pp. 46–53.